rain and the rhinoceros


A Theological Reading of the Anglican Division?
May 6, 2008, 1:12 pm
Filed under: Anglicanism, Rowan Williams

I find it saddening but also quite fascinating that the Anglican communion appears to be on the brink of total division, despite the fact that the present Archbishop of Canterbury is probably one of the greatest Christian leaders that has ever lived. How do we read this theologically?


11 Comments so far
Leave a comment

“Oh, shit.”

Comment by d. w. horstkoetter May 7, 2008 @ 6:19 pm

Perhaps this is all we can say.

Comment by R.O. Flyer May 8, 2008 @ 12:07 am

I’m behind. What is the split?

Comment by becks May 8, 2008 @ 1:08 pm

There is a great deal of controversy in the Anglican communion surrounding issues like homosexuality and ordination, along with a host of other issues. Much of the conflict is between the U.S. Episcopal church and the rest of the Anglican communion, especially among more conservative Anglicans. The whole thing is a big big mess and it looks really bad for the future of the Anglican communion.

Comment by R.O. Flyer May 8, 2008 @ 1:18 pm

That’s life.

The ‘Anglican communion’ has been held together by velcro (er…stitched thread) for a few hundred years.

Wow! I sound really cynical. Sorry. Should we really be concerned over the Anglican communion? You are not going to convince conservative Anglicans that it is ok for homosexuals to be ordained.

Comment by Roger Flyer May 8, 2008 @ 5:51 pm

Can we elect Rowan Williams to be pope? I mean seriously, we could be elcting a woman or a black man to be Presiden t of the US. Do you think they saw that coming 50 years ago?

Comment by Roger Flyer May 8, 2008 @ 5:54 pm

To give a serious answer to your question.

House church?

Comment by roger flyer May 8, 2008 @ 6:31 pm

The problem is, if the Anglican communion can’t stay together, no one will. Theologically they are pretty much the most flexible denomination (the methodist will give them a run for their money though) and if they can’t figure out a solution, I’m thinking the rest of the denominations are just screwed.

Comment by d. w. horstkoetter May 8, 2008 @ 7:19 pm

1 became 2 became 3 became 16 became 32 64 128 to15000 denominations now

Comment by roger flyer May 8, 2008 @ 10:08 pm

Thanks for the clarification about the split. I knew about the controversies and subjects for debate. I didn’t think it was a breaking into two camps so much as a fracturing of the denomination as a body.

Comment by becks May 17, 2008 @ 12:22 am

The Christian Century has a somewhat lengthy article on it: http://www.christiancentury.org/article.lasso?id=4770

Comment by d. w. horstkoetter May 19, 2008 @ 10:21 pm



Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>